More than a month after the judgment in Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s defamation trial was revealed, it is still hotly debated. The jury in the widely watched trial sided with the 59-year-old actor, ruling that the 36-year-old actress’ defamatory remarks about the actor’s alleged assault were false.
The jury has directed the “Aquaman” actress to pay the “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor $10 million in damages and $350,000 in penalties. Heard was dissatisfied with the decision, and her lawyers have since claimed that there were flaws in the legal reasoning and jury selection that led to the judgment. They have also complained that Depp was given too much money in the slander claim.
El Nacional reports that the actress has asked to meet with Depp to renegotiate her salary. Heard urged the court to reduce the $10,350,000 defamation judgment against her that was handed down by the jury. Heard reportedly asked her legal team to appeal the trial sentence since she and her ex-spouse were unable to come to an agreement during their private meeting.
“After a brief hearing at the Fairfax County Court, which was not attended by any of those concerned. Heard’s team has opted to appeal since they were unable to come to an arrangement amicably or with their attorneys present. Each side has 30 days to file their notice of appeal with the Virginia Court of Appeals “Indicators from the portal.
View this post on Instagram
Heard’s attorney Elaine Bredehoft previously stated on the Today Show that the actress would not be able to pay the sum awarded by the jury, and that “Oh no, definitely not.” Bredehoft, according to Deadline, was attempting to establish a briefing schedule and other logistics for a potential appeal by Heard. Bredehoft was informed by Judge Penney Azcarate that her attorney would need to file appropriate motions in order to appeal the jury’s judgment.
For any appeal to be heard, the judge ordered Heard’s counsel to post bail in the amount of $8.35 million, with interest at the rate of 6 percent each year. According to the New York Post, Heard’s spokesman said, “Innocent people don’t seek pardons. If you’re confident in your position, you won’t forego filing an appeal.”
According to the portal, Judge Azcarate typed out Depp’s ruling without any of Heard’s suggested changes. It has been claimed that Depp’s legal team did not seek an injunction. “I felt I owed it to my kids and to everyone who has stood by me throughout the years to finally come clean and tell the truth. Now that I know I have finished it, I can rest easy “After the verdict, Depp penned a letter.
Legal Representation for Amber Heard Has Requested That the Jury’s Defamation Judgment Against Johnny Depp Be Overturned
A month after a seven-person jury found in favor of Johnny Depp in the defamation lawsuit brought against Amber Heard, her legal team has petitioned to have the judgment thrown out.
In February of 2019, Depp filed a defamation lawsuit against Heard for an op-ed she published for The Washington Post in 2018. In the piece, Heard discussed her experience as a survivor of domestic violence. His attorneys said the article indicated that Depp had physically and se*ually assaulted his wife during their marriage, despite the fact that he was not specifically identified. Heard countersued, claiming that Depp’s lawyers had libeled her in publications in 2020.
On June 1, a jury found that Heard’s comments regarding her marriage were “false” and that she had acted with “actual malice,” awarding Depp $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. The amount of any punitive damages were capped at $350,000 by state law. While the jury decided that Depp had defamed Heard through his lawyer, Heard was granted $2 million in compensatory damages.
Attorneys for Heard filed a memorandum on July 1 in Virginia Circuit Court, arguing that the verdict in favor of Depp and against Heard was “excessive… in light of the evidence and law,” and asking for the verdict to be overturned in its entirety with Depp’s complaint dismissed, or requesting a new trial.
Depp “provided no proof that Ms. Heard did not think she was abused,” according to Heard’s legal team, thus he does not meet the legal threshold for real malice. Defendant Depp’s lawyers “proceeded purely on a defamation by implication approach, discarding any accusations that Ms. Heard’s remarks were genuinely incorrect,” the report continued.
Heard’s attorneys also allege poor vetting of jurors and ask the court to look into “possible inappropriate juror service” elsewhere in the lengthy brief (which totals 43 pages).
One juror’s “identification and demographics” don’t match up with what’s included on the jury panel roster, the document states. When selecting a jury, “Juror No. 15 was obviously born in 1970, not 1945,” as had been represented and relied upon by the parties (including Ms. Heard).
Since “the identity of the juror does not appear to have been confirmed,” the lawsuit questions whether “Juror No. 15 was ever called for jury duty or qualified to serve on the panel.”
The Court should look into this to see if the juror was actually called and if the parties’ due process rights were violated. The investigation’s findings might provide sufficient cause to vacate the verdict in its entirety and retry the case.
Moreover, the statement claims that the damages granted to Depp were “excessive” and “inconsistent and irreconcilable” with the jury’s finding that both stars had defamed one other.
A day after the decision was handed out, Heard’s lawyer Elaine Bredehoft said that her client could “absolutely not” pay the $10.35million that had been granted to Depp and that there were “strong grounds” for an appeal.
Depp’s main attorney Ben Chew told Courthouse News that the move to throw out the verdict was “what we expected, only lengthier [and] no more significant.”
After the verdict, Judge Penney Azcarate explained to Heard that she would need to submit petitions with the court in order to appeal the decision. Azcarate further stated that in order for Heard’s appeal to proceed, he would be required to post bail in the amount of $8.35 million.
Before the 2020 trial between Depp and Heard ever began, the actor had already lost a libel claim he had brought against the owners of The Sun. His casting in the Fantastic Beasts film series was called into doubt in the piece, which the tabloid had published despite Heard’s claims of abuse. Twelve of Heard’s fourteen allegations of Depp’s violent behavior were deemed “basically accurate” by the High Court.
According to a statement released by Heard after the conviction was handed down last month, she expressed her disappointment in the result, saying, “I’m devastated that the avalanche of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband.”
For some women, this judgment is even more devastating. This is a frustrating setback. This is a throwback to a time when women were punished for speaking their minds. It undermines the concept that violence against women should be handled seriously.
Depp remarked at the time that the decision gave him his “life back,” and that he was “deeply humbled” by the outcome of the trial and the conviction. “I owed it to my children and to all those who have stayed strong in their support of me,” he continued. Now that I’ve finished it, I can rest easy.